To compare intrapartum cardiotocographic (CTG) recording with conventional intermittent fetal heart auscultation during labor

Authors

  • Isha Bansal Department of Obst and Gynae, BPS Govt. Medical college for women, Khanpur Kalan, Sonepat, Haryana, India
  • Richa Kansal Department of Obst and Gynae, BPS Govt. Medical college for women, Khanpur Kalan, Sonepat, Haryana, India
  • R. Mahendru Department of Obst and Gynae, BPS Govt. Medical college for women, Khanpur Kalan, Sonepat, Haryana, India
  • Sunita Siwach Department of Obst and Gynae, BPS Govt. Medical college for women, Khanpur Kalan, Sonepat, Haryana, India
  • Deepak Singla Department of Obst and Gynae, BPS Govt. Medical college for women, Khanpur Kalan, Sonepat, Haryana, India
  • Manjeet Singh Department of Obst and Gynae, BPS Govt. Medical college for women, Khanpur Kalan, Sonepat, Haryana, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30750/ijpbr.2.3.12

Abstract

Standard evaluation of fetal well-being during labor includes the periodic assessment of the fetal heart rate (FHR), its pattern and response to intrapartum stimuli and events. Effective methods of evaluation and meaningful interpretation of FHR data range from non-invasive techniques like Intermittent Auscultation, continuous electronic fetal heart rate (FHR) monitoring to invasive techniques of fetal blood gas analysis and fetal ECG.

Downloads

Published

2014-09-30

How to Cite

1.
Bansal I, Kansal R, Mahendru R, Siwach S, Singla D, Singh M. To compare intrapartum cardiotocographic (CTG) recording with conventional intermittent fetal heart auscultation during labor. IJPBR [Internet]. 2014Sep.30 [cited 2026Jul.11];2(03):76-9. Available from: https://ijpbr.in/index.php/IJPBR/article/view/846

Issue

Vol. 2 No. 03 (2014): Indian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biological Research

Section

Table of Content